Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Excerpt: Family Rituals and the Construction of Reality

Coltrane, Scott. [1997] 2005. "Family Rituals and the Construction of Reality". Pp. 245-252 in Understanding Society, 2nd ed., edited by Margaret L. Andersen, Kim Logio, and Howard Taylor. Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning, Inc.

Social life is characterized by ritual. When we apply for a job, there is a protocol dictating the proper order for various actions, including the submission of a résumé, interview, follow-up, and either rejection or offer/acceptance. When we go out to a restaurant, there's an etiquette to how we sit, how we order, how much we order, how we eat, how we pay, and how we stand and leave. In anthropology, ritual is used to describe cultures by examining the foibles of particular societies. In sociology, ritual is largely ignored (to the detriment of the discipline, I would argue).

Coltrane discusses the ritual of Thanksgiving Dinner. He begins with a portrayal of this American ritual from the comedy film Home for the Holidays (1995), and examines the functions that family-centered holidays play in today's America. "Prior to the 1900s", he says, "civic festivals and Fourth of July parades in America were much more important occasions for celebration and strong emotion than family holidays".

One function of family-centered rituals is to reaffirm and redefine the family experience:
Although our culture provides us with an overarching sense of what a family should be, we need to learn what it means to be in a particular family through direct experience and learning, and we need to re-create a sense of belonging over and over again.
Part of this re-creation is defining where and how we fit in: what our role in the family is. Traditional roles are played out (father and son, mother and daughter, etc.) to reaffirm our membership in the family. Rituals like Thanksgiving Dinner allow us to "construct group identity and create a shared sense of reality", which means defining the qualities and relationships for our individual family.

Roles are often gendered; women orchestrate the events and prepare the meal while men sit around and watch football (exceptions being carving the turkey, grilling/barbecuing in summer months, etc.). Coltrane shifts the discussion to what we culturally define as "women's work" and "men's work", and how these definitions often lead to young boys learning to accept the privilege of their gender while their sisters work in the kitchen.

This article deals with an important concept: identity construction. In understanding social behavior, we must understand how people understand themselves. Since self-concepts affect the nature of our interactions, shared structures and values that influence them directly contribute to the nature of our collective actions. The meanings that people derive from their culture about what a family should be, for example, shape their definitions of "mother" or "father" and the relationship between them, which carry on into daily life and different settings.

Relevance: 4/5 (relevant)
Salience: 5/5 (salient)

References:
  • Baxter, J. 1993. Work at Home: The Domestic Division of Labor. St. Lucia, Australia: Queensland University Press.
  • Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Berger, P., and H. Kellner. 1964. "Marriage and the Construction of Reality". Diogenes 46:1-23.
  • Blumberg, R.L. 1984. "A General Theory of Gender Stratification". In Sociological Theory 1984, edited by R. Collins. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Blumberg, R.L., and M.T. Coleman. 1989. "A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple". Journal of Family Issues 10:225-50.
  • Byng-Hall, J. 1988. "Scripts and Legends in Families and Family Therapy". Family Process 27:167-79.
  • Collins, R. 1988. Theoretical Sociology. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Coltrane, Scott. 1989. "Household Labor and the Routine Production of Gender". Social Problems 36:473-90.
  • Coltrane, Scott. 1996. Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Coontz, S. 1992. The Way We Never Were. New York: Basic Books.
  • Delphy, C. 1984. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression. Translated by D. Leonard. London: Hutchison.
  • DeVault, M. 1991. Feeding the Family: The Social Construction of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • diLeonardo, M. 1987. "The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families, and the work of Kinship". Signs 12:440-53.
  • Durkheim, Emile. [1915] 1957. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
  • Fenstermaker-Berk, S. 1985. The Gender Factory. New York: Plenum.
  • Ferree, M. 1987. "She Works Hard for a Living". Pp. 322-347 in Analyzing Gender, edited by B. Hess and M. Ferree. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Doubleday.
  • Gubrium, J., and J. Holstein. 1990. What is Family? Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
  • Hartmann, H. 1981. "The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework". Signs 6:366-94.
  • Hochschild, A., and A. Manning. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Viking.
  • Imber-Black, E., J. Roberts, and R. Whiting, eds. 1988. Rituals in Family and Family Therapy. New York: Norton.
  • Komter, A. 1989. "Hidden Power in Marriage". Gender & Society 3:187-216.
  • Luxton, M. 1980. More than a Labor of Love: Three Generations of Women's Work in the Home. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Women's Press.
  • Pearson, J., R. West, and L. Turner. 1995. Gender and Communications. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
  • Pyke, K., and Scott Coltrane. 1996. "Entitlement, Gratitude, and Obligation in Family Work". Journal of Family Issues 17:60-82.
  • Reskin, B.F., and I. Padavic. 1994. Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
  • Shelton, B.A. 1992. Women, Men, Time. New York: Greenwood.
  • Skolnick, A. 1991. Embattled Paradise: The American Family in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Basic Books.
  • Stack, C.B., and L.M. Burton. 1994. "Kinscripts: Reflections of Family, Generation, and Culture". Pp 33-44 in Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, edited by E.N. Glenn, G. Chang, and L.R. Forcey. New York: Routledge.
  • Thompson, L., and A.J. Walker. 1989. "Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood". Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:845-71.
  • Thorne, B. 1992. Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, revised ed. Boston: Northeastern University press.
  • Vannoy-Hiller, D. 1984. "Power Dependence and Division of Family and Work". Sex Roles 1:1003-1019.
  • West, C., and S. Fenstermaker. 1993. "Power and the Accomplishment of Gender: An Ethnomethological Perspective". Pp. 151-74 in Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory Social Institutions and Social Change edited by P. England. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • West, C., and D. Zimmerman. 1987. "Doing Gender". Gender & Society 1:125-51.
  • Wood, J.T. 1996. "She Says/He Says: Communication, Caring, and Conflict in Heterosexual Relationships". Pp. 149-62 in Gendered Relationships, edited by J.T. Wood. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

No comments:

Post a Comment